Carbon dating methods accurate

01-Apr-2020 14:43

" Answer: Carbon dating, or radiocarbon dating, like any other laboratory testing technique, can be extremely reliable, so long as all of the variables involved are controlled and understood.Several factors affect radiocarbon test results, not all of which are easy to control objectively.Nor can it tell if a much older spearhead was attached to a brand-new shaft.The field of radiocarbon dating has become a technical one far removed from the naive simplicity which characterized its initial introduction by Libby in the late 1940's.So they start with the assumption that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, then manipulate the results until they agree with their conclusion. So why is it that if the date doesn't fit the theory, they change the facts?In a related article on geologic ages (Ages), we presented a chart with the various geologic eras and their ages.Radiocarbon is not used to date the age of rocks or to determine the age of the earth.

The slope of the line determines the date, and the closeness of fit is a measure of the statistical reliability of the resulting date.This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be .For this reason, it’s preferable to date objects using multiple methods, rather than relying on one single test.Carbon dating is reliable within certain parameters but certainly not infallible.

The slope of the line determines the date, and the closeness of fit is a measure of the statistical reliability of the resulting date.

This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.

The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be .

For this reason, it’s preferable to date objects using multiple methods, rather than relying on one single test.

Carbon dating is reliable within certain parameters but certainly not infallible.

They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion.