Radio carbon dating doesnt prove anything Free msg sex chat with girls without registration

20-Oct-2019 09:29

The first is that atoms have always decayed at the same rate.And this isn’t really an assumption as the decay rates have been tested in the laboratory for a hundred years or so, we have an example of a natural nuclear reactor where we can measure the various products and determine the decay rates (and the fine structure constant), and we can observe the past by looking deep into the past of the universe. The sigh isn’t for the effort of writing, it’s for the effort of finding all the references.

From the mapped field relationships, it is a simple matter to work out a geological cross-section and the relative timing of the geologic events.These were then eroded and Sedimentary Rocks B were deposited.Rarely a week goes by without someone emailing me with a comment similar to the following: "They have found some fossils near where I live and have carbon-dated them to be 100 million years old".There is a lot to be written about dating methods-and many articles on the subject appear on the Answers in Genesis website-but what I am more concerned about in this article is, why do so many people believe that carbon-dating has dated fossils to be millions of years old.The evolutionary scientists themselves have never said that carbon-dating has been used on fossils; so why do people in the media and on the street think that they have? Carbon exists in a number of different types, called isotopes, which have different masses, depending on the number of neutrons in the nucleus.

From the mapped field relationships, it is a simple matter to work out a geological cross-section and the relative timing of the geologic events.

These were then eroded and Sedimentary Rocks B were deposited.

Rarely a week goes by without someone emailing me with a comment similar to the following: "They have found some fossils near where I live and have carbon-dated them to be 100 million years old".

There is a lot to be written about dating methods-and many articles on the subject appear on the Answers in Genesis website-but what I am more concerned about in this article is, why do so many people believe that carbon-dating has dated fossils to be millions of years old.

The evolutionary scientists themselves have never said that carbon-dating has been used on fossils; so why do people in the media and on the street think that they have? Carbon exists in a number of different types, called isotopes, which have different masses, depending on the number of neutrons in the nucleus.

Carbon-13 is also stable, radioactively, but carbon-14 is radioactive.